Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 11 results ...

Araujo, L G, Piña, A B S, Aidar, L A G, Coelho, G O and Carvalho, M T M (2019) Recommendations and guidelines for implementing PPP projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 262–76.

Dabarera, G, Perera, B and Rodrigo, M (2019) Suitability of public-private-partnership procurement method for road projects in Sri Lanka. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 199–213.

Hartwell, J C, Upadhyay, Y and Sourani, A (2019) Influential factors of life cycle management in education PFI projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 302–14.

Jayasuriya, S, Zhang, G and Jing Yang, R (2019) Challenges in public private partnerships in construction industry. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 172–85.

Kavishe, N, Chileshe, N and Jefferson, I (2019) Public–private partnerships in Tanzanian affordable housing schemes. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 233–47.

Marinelli, M (2019) Evaluation of PPP road projects in Greece. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 186–98.

Oliveros-Romero, J and Aibinu, A A (2019) Ex post impact evaluation of PPP projects: an exploratory research. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 315–30.

Pellegrino, R, Carbonara, N and Costantino, N (2019) Public guarantees for mitigating interest rate risk in PPP projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 248–61.

Umar, A A, Zawawi, N A W A and Abdul-Aziz, A (2019) Exploratory factor analysis of skills requirement for PPP contract governance. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 277–90.

Zhang, Y and Tan, W (2019) The leading small group: an institutional innovation for PPP projects in China. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 291–301.

Zhao, N and Ying, F (2019) Method selection: a conceptual framework for public sector PPP selection. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(02), 214–32.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: PPP; Methods; Decision making; Decision support systems; Private funded; Selection framework;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 2044-124X
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-01-2018-0018
  • Abstract:
    The purpose of this paper is to establish a conceptual framework to assist decision makers in identifying an appropriate decision-supporting method (DSM) to evaluate public-private partnership (PPP) contract types in a disciplined and systematic manner. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review was conducted to compare and analyse DSMs in construction procurement processes, and explore the benefits and limitations of using DSMs. A conceptual framework is then developed to accommodate client characteristics when selecting DSM in a PPP context. An example was obtained to illustrate the implementation of the proposed framework. Findings DSMs employed in the procurement method selection are identified by using a systemic literature review. The benefits and limitations of each DSM are established and comparisons of DSMs are provided to fit the client characteristics and a conceptual framework is developed to assist decision makers in choosing DSM for contract selection. Originality/value This paper demonstrates a link between DSMs and PPP contracts which adds value at the stage of PPP contract evaluation. Also, the proposed framework sheds some light on an important aspect of the public sector to consider the improvement of current policies (PPP framework/guideline).